Nuggets from Cosmos, Creator, and Human Destiny

We have already commented upon what seems to be an obvious fact: Dawkins treats Darwin almost as though he were God. Whatever Darwin said must be true. This superhuman status given to Darwin by evolutionists ought in itself to cast suspicion on this whole evolutionary system. It indicates a form of blindness when it comes to Darwinism. No human being is infallible. Darwin is not pronouncing natural law such as the laws of physics and chemistry, which can be verified and also falsified. He is merely giving us the theory with which many scientists disagree, scientists who were certainly at least as intelligent and competent as he, and obviously, with the advance of science since Darwin’s day, now know far more than he did. Then why should we fall in line and embrace what clearly has so many contradictions, lack of evidence, and so many “missing links”?