Nuggets from Cosmos, Creator, and Human Destiny

Who could prove that Dawkins’s declaration isn’t true? No one. This theory is not science but a never-never land of unproved theories stated as truth. This is a bald-faced conjecture confidently presented as if it were scientific fact. It is not falsifiable, as any truly scientific theory must be, yet it is authoritatively announced as though it were. This is a deliberate deception. He gets away with it because this is Richard Dawkins speaking, Oxford University’s former Simonyi Professor of the Public Understanding of Science. Surely he wouldn’t betray that noble status and give the public anything but scientific facts, would he?