When evolutionary biologist Colin Wright has debated Christian conservatives on the topic of creationism or intelligent design, he said they would frequently tell him he is “wrong or stupid, but my critics never called me a bigot.”
Not so when it comes to some on the academic left, who Wright argues have effectively derailed his career in academia by targeting him with cancel culture, mob-like tactics to potential employers who might considerhim for tenure-track.
Why? Because he refuses to stop saying this publicly: “Male and female are not social constructs, but are real biological categories that do not fall on a spectrum.”
Wright spells out his story in a July 30 piece for Quillette titled “Think Cancel Culture Doesn’t Exist? My Own ‘Lived Experience’ Says Otherwise.”
Wright, who graduated with a PhD in evolutionary biology from UC Santa Barbara in 2018 and most recently worked in a post doctoral position at Penn State, detailed how his critics who are furious he will notagree biological sex exists on a continuous “spectrum” effectively forced him out of his plans to become a professor of biology.
The outspoken evolutionary biologist explains in his piece that he really did try to shut up about his views, knowing they could derail his career plans.
But time and again the ridiculous dogma from the far-left that insists in the “pseudoscience … that sex differences in human personality, preferences, and behavior are entirely the result of socialization” drew him out of the shadows.
In detailing the campaign against him, Wright pointed to several anecdotes. It started when “Blank-Slate feminists and trans activists alike publicly accused me of wrong think” after his first piece in 2018.
After his second article in 2019, “I received word that someone had posted a new listing in EcoEvo Jobs, the largest job board in my field, that read, ‘Colin Wright is a Transphobe who supports Race Science.’ This was during the height of the academic-recruitment season. The post was eventually removed by the board operator. But there was no telling how long it was up or how many of my colleagues had seen it.”
But it was his piece earlier this year in The Wall Street Journal that did him in for good: “Even more than other pieces I’d bylined, this one unleashed a tidal wave of online hate—perhaps because we’d pricked the precious conceit that gender ideology saves children instead of harming them. Several Penn State professors publicly denounced the essay as transphobic. Students and faculty complained to my department’s diversity committee that I’d launched “a personal attack on individuals with non-binary gender identity,” and that my presence at PSU “made them feel less comfortable.” …
“It was around this time that I was contacted by a biology-department chair at a private liberal arts college in the Midwest. He commended me for my writings, and told me that he’d even used my New Evolution Deniers essay as a basis for discussion in his own classes. But while he and his fellow biology-department faculty would likely support my hiring, he said, the school’s own human-resources department would almost certainly block me as “too risky.” …
“Guilt by association is a hallmark of all social panics. And in early March, I received a text message from a close friend and research collaborator who is now an assistant professor at a major research university, informing me that his colleagues had started questioning him about our affiliation. He told me that this sort of thing was happening frequently enough that he felt the need to publicly denounce my views to clear his name. And that’s exactly what he did. Ask yourself what other ideological movements and historical periods we tend to associate with such performative acts.…”
Later that month, someone again posted “Colin Wright is a Transphobe who supports Race Science” to the EcoEvo Jobs board. I contacted the board operator—again—expressing my concerns. This time, I received no response.
In April, Wright explained, he chose to leave academia.